I grew up in a country house. To be more accurate, I grew up
in a house in the country, as my family doesn’t have an urban townhouse to
which we decamp for most of the year. Instead, I spent the first 18 years of
life on a farm in the Outer Bluegrass of Kentucky, surrounded not only by
tree-lined creeks and rolling hills, but also by the stories attached to a beloved
landscape.
The house itself, built by my parents in 1970, is a re-imagining
of the 1830s home in Mercer County, Kentucky, which my mother called home. Serene
on a hill with clusters of trees, its red brick exterior and traditional form causes
it to be mistaken as a historic house many, many times, underscoring its
membership in a timeless vocabulary of architecture and landscape.
|
Great Uncle Harvey |
As I went through graduate school, the “historicization” of
modern buildings was consistently lambasted as a negative, but I always viewed
my childhood home as an organic part of the our family farm, as much a part of
the landscape as the black tobacco barns and the catalpa trees that my
great-uncle Harvey planted in the 19-teens (in a get-rich quick scheme to
corner the market on fence posts and railroad ties. It didn’t work out as he
planned).
|
Some of Uncle Harvey's catalpa trees |
My mother taught history and my father farmed the land that
had been in his family since the 1820s. Family trips centered on historic sites
and house museums, where I invariably got in trouble for sneaking up the
closed-off staircase to the attics or basements, or opening shut doors when the
docent turned around. I knew even then that the best stories were usually
hidden away, sometimes literally in a closet.
I soaked up my parent’s appreciation of history, and from an
early age I vaguely understood that I was part of a cycle. My story was only
the latest layer. Farming drilled this point home, as life and death could not
be avoided. Becoming fond of a calf I raised on a bottle led to trauma and
tears when he was sold along with the other steers…but I remained an
equal-opportunity eater.
Stories informed me and comforted me. In school, I naturally
gravitated toward both literature and history. Kentucky’s story was my family’s
tale as well – from the late-18th century when brothers came to the
Bluegrass on a military expedition, and then moved the entire extended family
from Virginia to Fayette County. I could point to chairs in the front hall of
my house that came through the Cumberland Gap during this journey. Material
culture asserted itself at an early age…
|
My great-grandparents. |
Westward migration repeated itself on a local level in the 1820s
when the younger sons moved eastward in search of cheaper land, and began to
purchase the land we farm now. These men
built houses as shelter and as symbols of their place in the agrarian economy,
providing fertile ground for me 150 years later, as I wrote my master’s thesis
about their architectural and agricultural choices. Their stories intertwine
with the landscape of my childhood, always tugging, always remembering. And yet
these roots, for the most part, I’ve found liberating rather than constrictive.
The lure of the true English country house then, echoes for
me, rather than being something new and unknown. All evidence points to my
ancestors leaving England one step ahead of the law, so I doubt the existence
of a “genetic memory” that provides me with the connection I feel with the
rural countryside of England. Rather, it is the interconnectedness of house,
land, and outlying rural communities - combined with a landscape that sparks sudden
and tight pangs of longing for the one I’ve known since birth – that pulls and
propels me toward the country house.
|
Petworth House in West Sussex, England |
And it is also, perhaps, the feeling of obligation – of
belonging to something weightier and more important – and occasionally draining
and overpowering – than your own daily concerns. Responsibility and stewardship
perhaps not sought, and grudgingly accepted. The English country house, of
course, carries the weight of these emotions much more so than my own “country”
background. But the basic connections
remain intact – and the use of house as a statement of power and prestige is
one well-known in antebellum Kentucky, and even in the 21st century
power plays of the thoroughbred horse farm world.
Delighted, then, doesn’t even begin to express my feelings
upon learning that I had been accepted to the 2104 Attingham Summer School.
Ear-splitting, shrieking and a spontaneous jig better illustrate my reaction
this spring (thankfully, my co-workers are quite familiar with the impressive
range of my voice, both in octaves and decibels).
Founded in 1952, with the initial goal of introducing
American curators to the “fabric and contents of the British Country House,”
the Summer School has “enjoyed outstanding success and is highly regarded by
museums, universities and historic preservation societies throughout the world
for its careful selection of members, and sustained academic standards.” (It’s
much better for me to quote from the website than to subject readers to
multiple exclamation points along with a stream of sentences most profound,
such as “the best 18 days ever.” “Brilliant.” “So awesome.” “I loved
it!!!!!!!!!!! Whoops. Those just crept in somehow.)
|
Sheep grazing at Chatsworth in Derbyshire |
Helen Lowenthal, of the Education Department of the Victoria
and Albert Museum, and Sir George Trevelyan, a pioneer of adult education and
Warden of Attingham Park combined forces to create the summer school. The
summer school’s moniker stemmed from Trevelyan’s place of employment, the 18th-century
country house in Shropshire, England, which was an adult education center from
1948-1971.
Eighteen days in England, with behind the scenes access to
around 30 houses, with the following purposes (again, I borrow from the
Attingham website to best describe this):
To EXAMINE the architectural and social history of the
historic house in Britain and its gardens and landscape setting.
To STUDY the contents of these buildings – their
paintings, sculpture, furniture, ceramics, silver, textiles and other applied
arts – as well as the planning, decorative treatment and use of the interiors.
To STIMULATE debate on problems relating to the
conservation and presentation of the country house and its contents.
Did I mention that it was absolutely wonderful? And that 48
scholars (24 Americans and 24 Europeans), traveling together on an
un-airconditioned coach (bus) became friends and conspirators as we flew
lightning fast from house to lecture to meals, all according to a highly
planned and timed schedule, and feasted our eyes on art collections that
museums covet, architecture with inspiring rhythms and use of materials, and
landscapes that would cause any self-respecting southern belle to fall into a
fit of vapors over the joy of it all? I saw and learned so much – and the
reflection that will cause these lessons to become a permanent part of my
mental fabrications (I hope) will stem from writing about the marvels of the
country house in England in July 2014. Stay tuned. And stay tuned as well as my blog gets reworked. Who knows what will happen? A new name (unless you scroll to the very first post, it makes no sense and is offensive), new design...and most importantly, new stories.
Labels: Bluegrass, Country house, England